Anyone watching Grey’s Anatomy recently will have witnessed the budding romance between two of the female characters, Callie Torres (played by Sara Ramirez) and Erica Hahn (played by Brooke Smith). Beginning with some mild flirtation last season which culminated in a season-finale kiss that blew the lesbian fan base away (not to mention wooed back a few of those who had given up on the show after the whole Isaiah Washington F-word fiasco), the relationship between these two has begun to develop into something more akin to the other heterosexual relationships on the show: funny with a side of sexy.
However, in a somewhat expected turn, things soon began to get questionable.
While Hahn’s character seemed to adjust to her coming out process relatively smoothly, Torres was cast with ongoing “gay panic”, constantly questioning her sexuality in a way that played on all of the homophobic jokes the show has shied of making directly. In an unfortunate turn of the story, Torres even turned to her male ex-lover for tips on how to approach the “uncharted territory” of the va-jay-jay. To which I say, I believe that any woman who says she hasn’t at least attempted once to chart her own territory, so to speak, is a liar. *ahem*
But seriously, I was disappointed that once again a woman was sent to learn about sexuality, even about her own body, from a man. It’s frustrating to watch the same stereotypes played out over and over again: women as sexually naive and men as the knowledgeable guides to not only their, but our own, pleasure.
That aside, the inclusion on a show as popular as Grey’s Anatomy of a viable lesbian couple experiencing the same foibles and romantic exploits as any of the straight couples on the show was a refreshing change; it received very little fanfare as compared to, say, ten years ago when Ellen came out in the biggest media splash of the season. Most of the audience seemed to accept this turn of events as pretty normal and even fun to watch.
Sadly, however, the fun has ended. Brooke Smith has been written off the show. Actually, she hasn’t even been given that respect. Her final scene comes without warning: Smith was told only last week about the departure. Reportedly her last appearance on the show only reveals the doctor getting into her car and driving, one presumes, home. Never to return. Rumours are flying wild about whose decision it was to drop the actress and the lesbian storyline, and as to the reasons for that canning, but the message is pretty clear: lesbians are a-okay as long as they don’t actually have relationships or have sex or even talk about it with the same fun euphemisms afforded the rest of the cast.
Shonda Rhimes has come forward with the expected PR play, stating that it was not a matter of homophobia (this show has had its share of that old battle, hasn’t it?) but that the producers want to allow Ramirez to show her magic…alone. Why the magic of one actress should be eclipsed by the presence of another is a mystery.
So what does everyone think? Mismatched chemistry, as Rhimes and the ABC party line insist, or straight up homophobia in the most blatant sense? If you are so inclined, you may contact ABC to leave a comment as to your thoughts on the decision to let Brooke Smith go and to abandon the lesbian storyline between Torres and Hahn.


Digg
four comments
I had given up on Grey's last year but decided to give it another try this season (the wonder that is surfthechannel makes this an easy task to accomplish). Not only do I have concerns over the way they have portrayed their homosexual story line, I also find it troubling to watch the story lines for all of the female characters. Perhaps it is watching the episodes back to back that makes it so glaringly obvious, but the role of each and every female character on the show has been to provide support, wisdom and strength to their male counterpart, either romantically or professionally, and usually at their own expense. When did it become alright for a male character on the show to call a female character a 'bitch' and not have her fight back? Do we really still care about Meredith & Derrick?
It was refreshing to see the two strongest female characters on the show (Callie & Hahn) transcend this (and ironic/predictable that they were the ones 'chosen' to portray lesbians) but the handling of this storyline has been insulting, to say the least. And now to read that Brooke Smith is being let go makes it all the more worse.
Homophobia and latent sexism?... hmmmm, maybe not the show for me.
Posted by jill
November 5, 2008, 9:34 AM
Brooke Smith never gets a break, does she? I was just reading on Racialicious yesterday about how viewers who initially were so pleased with the diverse staff of protagonists were realizing that the non-white characters were quickly shifting into the roles of nothing more than enablers for the more prominent white cast members. That's what this is like. The gays can't lead the show, they can't even play a decent sized party, they have to just be around to give the straights relationship advice, or, y'know, ask the straights for sex advice. Oooh, GA is so frustrating. It could be so awesome with a cast like that, but nooooo. That show has such a large gay and female following, and it does nothing but ignore and spit on its biggest fans.
Posted by Michelle
November 5, 2008, 9:55 AM
Actually, Smith was fired in mid-September (it states so in the EW article). Which really sucks because this means ABC has been sitting on this news for a month and a half and leads me to believe they did this to try and curb any backlash.
I know many people are pissed at Shonda for her response but I'm going to do the indefensible - defend Shonda Rhimes. I mean, seriously, you'd think the showrunner for the NUMBER ONE SHOW in primetime would have the leverage to do whatever the hell she wants. And I think it really says something that one of the most successful female showrunners, let alone African-American, is being cut off at the knees by a bunch of corporate beancounters suffering from 'gay panic'.
Posted by MD Kidd
November 5, 2008, 11:04 AM
It's a tricky one. I actually did just that... I started watching it, not again, but for the first time. To clarify, I had actually watched the first and second episode, but it just looked too much like teenage angst will he/won't he love me, to really be interesting... and the attempts at edgy in the medical area were very transparent. There almost had to be a twist... it was just horrifically contrived, so I dismissed it as a poorly written/poorly acted/dumbed-down piece that just wasn't for me. So when the lesbian theme looked like it was emerging... I thought I'll give it a go... but, frankly, it was the same as the other jokey ways of looking at anything different in GA universe... treated as experimentation and suspect. So, of course I expected that there would be a going back to men, or that they would handle it poorly. And so I think I got what I expected. Which is the number one problem I have with GA in the first place... it's just so pedestrian.
I think like everything else with GA, the response is clearly about the fan base, who clearly want the Mills and Boon fantasy, just not getting how the two girls fit into their worldview.
Posted by Sandy O'Sullivan
November 5, 2008, 2:55 PM
Leave a comment
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.