This interesting article from the Courier Mail in Australia was sent to me recently.
Here’s a nice little snippet:
PRESCHOOL girls are being targeted with sexed-up dolls, which could create a generation of teenagers who hate themselves, experts say.
Queensland child protection group Bravehearts told the Senate inquiry into “the Sexualisation of Children in the Contemporary Media Environment” that sexualised dolls were being marketed to girls at a younger age than ever before.
“Barbie dolls, originally marketed at six to 10-year olds, are now appealing to three to six-year olds and highly sexualised dolls such as Bratz and MyScene dolls are at the forefront of a trend that promotes stereotyped and sexualised images,” the submission’s author, Hetty Johnston, said.
She said the dolls’ “fishnet stockings, tight-fitting clothes, high heels and heavily made-up faces and large pouty lips” exposed little girls to dangerous stereotypes.
Now I’ve always been of the mindset that we cannot leave it up to the media and pop culture to be the sole forms of education for our children, however I have been noticing the shift in the appearance of toys like Bratz dolls.
I would also hope that the ability to teach self and social confidence would trump materialistic followings like toys, or even better make people empowered in their own sexuality while wearing things like “fishnet stockings, tight-fighting clothes, etc”.
I could never find a Barbie that looked like me anyway.
What say you? Can we really blame toys for the oversexualization that has occurred in mainstream society?


Digg
three comments
In the real world it's often tough to separate cause and effect. It's too bad that brands like Bratz feed girls a distorted, over-sexualized picture of themselves, but I think we often subvert their messages during play. My Barbie had a school set that only came with English and History textbooks, so my mom made little cardboard Math and Science books. My dolls did most of the things that powerful women in my life did - they spent more time working or studying than at the mall. Women are pretty resilient. And thank god, because there's a lot of crap out there to contend with.
Posted by Allison
April 30, 2008, 11:52 AM
No, we can't blame toys for where we've arrived today, but we can question why these toys are still being manufactured. Who can claim that they are helping the situation? As a parent, I would find it refreshing if I could go to a store and easily find a doll that didn't sexualize childhood.
If we lived in a society where woman and men were valued equally for the same things, some of these toys might be fine. But we don't, and they aren't.
Posted by Lisa @ Corporate Babysitter
April 30, 2008, 4:21 PM
I don't think that toys could ever be wholly responsible for the oversexualization of young girls (patriarchy, classism, racism, music culture, corporate media, the 'beauty ' and 'fitness' industries are all right up there too). It's kind of like saying violent video games make kids violent. They likely do not help, but they cannot be the sole cause and to argue so is scapegoating. Rather, I think pop culture symbols like children's toys tend to mirror, distort, and enhance reality. Chomsky has some interesting things to say about this, but I won't get too analytical.
At least Barbie had a job and a stable relationship? I could never find one that looked like me either.
Posted by Lex
April 30, 2008, 8:18 PM
Leave a comment
This blog post is older than 90 days old. All comments submitted regarding this post will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
Our comment policy
Shameless prides itself on the diversity of opinions expressed by our writers, and we encourage and appreciate different points of view. Our intention at Shameless is to foster community and to maintain a safe and positive blogging environment; we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. We will delete comments that:
(We get to decide what's discriminatory, hateful, attacking, or inflammatory).
In some cases, we will cap off comments on a discussion when we feel they are spiralling out of control and fostering an unwelcoming space for bloggers and readers. Comments will be closed by the Web Editor, unless the post is by the Web Editor, in which case the Editor in Chief will close them.
If your comments repeatedly make the same point, they may be deleted. This also applies to comments made by multiple members of the same organization.
Your comments should be about the topic of the post, not its writer—although we certainly encourage praise for our writers, if you want to say something nice.